🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental attacks on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding signs against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.